000			01491nam a2200241 4500
001			ESSALUD
005			20260903095213.0
007			ta
008			t pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d
040			_aBMG
041			_aeng
100			_aNallamothu, Brahmajee K. _eAutor _954519
245			_aPrice of protection — Microaxial flow pump in high-risk PCI
300			_apáginas: 1855-1856
520			_aIn the catheterization laboratory, the most consequential decisions are frequently not about whether to treat, but rather about how far to extend treatment. Nowhere is that tension more apparent than in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In these cases, the margin between a good outcome and a catastrophic one is narrow, and the instinct to add protection with mechanical circulatory support can be powerful. Transient ischemia induced by balloon inflation or atherectomy can precipitate physiological collapse in patients with little reserve. Yet, to date, randomized trials have not supported routine use of mechanical circulatory support in cases other than cardiogenic shock.
650			_aCARDIOLOGÍA GENERAL _953638
650			_aENFERMEDAD CORONARIA _914895
650			_aINFARTO DE MIOCARDIO _913202
650			_aSOPORTE CIRCULATORIO MECÁNICO _954520
700			_aWanamaker, Brett L. _954521
773	0		_022717 _922676 _dMassachusetts NEJM Group _oNEJM015 _tThe New England Journal of Medicine _wESSALUD _x0028-4793
942			_cARTICULOS _e2026-08-31 _zsqb
999			_c22917 _d22917