000 03084nam a2200373 4500
001 ESSALUD
005 20260902145039.0
007 ta
008 t pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d
040 _aBMG
041 _aeng
100 _aLimbrick, David D.
_eAutor
_954408
245 _aDecompression with or without Duraplasty for Chiari I and Syringomyelia
300 _apáginas: 2015-2025
520 _aBackground: In children with Chiari type I malformation and syringomyelia, neurosurgical posterior fossa decompression (PFD) provides clinical improvement, but whether duraplasty (incising the dura and placing a dural graft) improves outcomes is unclear. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled trial of PFD with duraplasty (PFD-D) as compared with PFD alone. Persons 21 years of age or younger with cerebellar tonsillar ectopia of at least 5 mm and a maximum syrinx diameter of 3.0 to 9.9 mm were enrolled at 38 centers. Centers were cluster-randomized: all the participants within each center underwent the same intervention. The primary outcome was surgical complications within 6 months. Secondary outcomes were clinical improvement, syrinx reduction, and repeat decompression at 10 to 24 months and the change in overall health-related quality of life at 6 to 24 months. Results: A total of 162 participants were included in the trial, of whom 78 were assigned to undergo PFD-D and 84 to undergo PFD alone. The percentage of participants with complications within 6 months was 14% with PFD-D and 6% with PFD (adjusted odds ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 7.84; P=0.11). At 24 months, the percentage of participants with clinical improvement was 58% with PFD-D and 46% with PFD; the mean (±SD) syrinx reduction was 3.08±2.33 mm and 1.22±1.79 mm, respectively; and the percentage of participants with repeat decompression was 3% and 14%. Changes in health-related quality of life were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: The percentage of participants with surgical complications did not differ significantly between those who underwent PFD-D and those who underwent PFD alone. Larger trials are needed to determine the relative benefits and risks of these two procedures.
650 _aENFERMEDADES INFANTILES
_953890
650 _aMEDICINA CLÍNICA HOSPITALARIA
_953754
650 _aORTOPEDIA GENERAL
_954409
650 _aPEDIATRÍA GENERAL
_954247
650 _aTRASTORNOS DE LA COLUMNA VERTEBRAL
_954410
650 _aNEUROLOGÍA
650 _aNEUROCIRUGÍA GENERAL
_953668
700 _aShannon, Chevis N.
_954411
700 _aBayman, Emine O.
_954412
700 _aMeehan, Thanda
_954413
700 _aKallem, Marisa
_954414
700 _aAckerman, Laurie L.
_954415
700 _aAdelson, P. David
_954416
700 _aAhmed, Raheel
_954417
700 _aAlbert, Gregory
_954418
700 _aAldana, Philipp R.
_954419
773 0 _022717
_922665
_dMassachusetts NEJM Group
_oNEJM013
_tThe New England Journal of Medicine
_wESSALUD
_x0028-4793
942 _cARTICULOS
_e2026-08-28
_zsqb
999 _c22888
_d22888