| 000 | 01624nam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ESSALUD | ||
| 005 | 20260805102227.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | t pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d | ||
| 040 | _aBMG | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 |
_aHotchkiss, Richard S. _eAutor _953924 |
||
| 245 | _aStemness as the engine of checkpoint durability | ||
| 300 | _apáginas: 2374-2377 | ||
| 520 | _aCheckpoint inhibitors have transformed cancer therapy, with 250,000 to 400,000 patients treated annually in the United States. By blocking programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1), checkpoint inhibitors suppress inhibitory signals that restrain T-cell activation, thereby restoring antitumor immunity. Despite early and sometimes dramatic responses, clinical benefits often wane. Retrospective analyses of checkpoint-inhibitor rechallenge show lower response rates and diminished durability as compared with initial treatment. These observations lead to the question: can prolonged or intensified PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade paradoxically compromise the long-term immune fitness required for sustained tumor control? A recent study by Hor et al. suggests that it does and provides a mechanistic framework that may reshape how checkpoint inhibitors are deployed and their durability extended. | ||
| 650 |
_aCANCER _91231 |
||
| 650 |
_aGENÉTICA _91105 |
||
| 650 |
_aHEMATOLOGÍA _97422 |
||
| 650 |
_aINMUNIDAD _938590 |
||
| 700 |
_aDiPersio, John F. _953925 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_022717 _922640 _dMassachusetts NEJM Group _oNEJM007 _tThe New England Journal of Medicine _wESSALUD _x0028-4793 |
|
| 942 |
_cARTICULOS _e2026-08-03 _zSQB |
||
| 999 |
_c22772 _d22772 |
||