| 000 | 03021nam a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ESSALUD | ||
| 005 | 20260805000739.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | t pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d | ||
| 040 | _aBMG | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 |
_aConradie, Francesca _eAutor _953877 |
||
| 245 | _aA pragmatic trial of a 6-month strategy for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis | ||
| 300 | _apáginas: 2429-2439 | ||
| 520 | _aBackground: Safer, more effective treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis are needed. Methods: We conducted a phase 3, open-label, pragmatic, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial in South Africa to assess a 6-month treatment strategy for pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Participants with pulmonary rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis who were 6 years of age or older were randomly assigned to a regimen consisting of bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid, and levofloxacin or clofazimine or both for 6 months (trial-strategy group) or the 9-month standard-of-care treatment regimen that was current in South Africa (control group). Persons who were pregnant or breastfeeding and those who had fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis were included in the trial population. Treatment in both groups was adjusted on the basis of results of second-line drug susceptibility testing. The primary efficacy end point was a successful outcome (cure or completion of treatment) at the end of treatment and at 76 weeks after randomization. The noninferiority margin was 10 percentage points. The primary safety end point was an adverse event of grade 3 or higher. Results: Among the 432 persons who were screened, 403 underwent randomization; 203 were assigned to the trial-strategy group, and 200 to the control group. A successful outcome was observed in 174 of 202 participants (86.1%) in the trial-strategy group and in 172 of 200 (86.0%) in the control group. The adjusted risk difference was −0.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], −6.9 to 6.5; P=0.001 for noninferiority). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred during treatment in 63 of 202 participants (31.2%) in the trial-strategy group and in 74 of 200 (37.0%) in the control group; 10 participants in each group died. Conclusions: Among participants in South Africa with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, the 6-month trial strategy was noninferior to the standard-of-care strategy with respect to a successful outcome. The safety profiles of the two strategies were similar. | ||
| 650 |
_aINFECCIONES BACTERIANAS _97357 |
||
| 650 |
_aSALUD GLOBAL _910472 |
||
| 650 |
_aENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS _96776 |
||
| 650 |
_aTUBERCULOSIS _91999 |
||
| 700 |
_aBadat, Tasnim _953878 |
||
| 700 |
_aPoswa, Asanda _953879 |
||
| 700 |
_aRajaram, Shakira _953880 |
||
| 700 |
_aKooverjee, Shaneen _953881 |
||
| 700 |
_aMaartens, Gary _953882 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_022717 _922639 _dMassachusetts NEJM Group _oNEJM006 _tThe New England Journal of Medicine _wESSALUD _x0028-4793 |
|
| 942 |
_cARTICULOS _e2026-07-31 _zSQB |
||
| 999 |
_c22762 _d22762 |
||