Childhood vaccine hesitancy

Por: O’Leary, Sean T [Autor]Colaborador(es): Danchin, MargieTipo de material: TextoTextoIdioma: Inglés Descripción: páginas: 2134-2145Tema(s): ALERGIA | ENFERMEDADES INFANTILES | SISTEMAS FAMILIARES Y COMUNICACIÓN | INMUNIZACIÓN | ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS | NEONATOLOGÍA | POLÍTICA SANITARIA En: The New England Journal of MedicineResumen: Vaccine hesitancy exists along a spectrum; most parents with hesitancy are motivated to protect their children but are often concerned about safety. Routine childhood vaccines recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics have substantially reduced the incidence of disease and maintain a strong safety record. Clinicians are the most trusted source of vaccine information, and clear, confident recommendations are closely linked to higher uptake. Presumptive communication approaches are more effective than open-ended approaches, especially when paired with respectful dialogue. Empathy-driven, patient-centered strategies, including motivational interviewing, help address concerns, counter misinformation, and build trust while preserving relationships that may encourage future vaccination decisions.
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Títulos de Revistas Títulos de Revistas Biblioteca Central ESSALUD
Colección General NEJM (Navegar estantería) Vol.394, No.21 (2026) Disponible NEJM011

Vaccine hesitancy exists along a spectrum; most parents with hesitancy are motivated to protect their children but are often concerned about safety. Routine childhood vaccines recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics have substantially reduced the incidence of disease and maintain a strong safety record. Clinicians are the most trusted source of vaccine information, and clear, confident recommendations are closely linked to higher uptake. Presumptive communication approaches are more effective than open-ended approaches, especially when paired with respectful dialogue. Empathy-driven, patient-centered strategies, including motivational interviewing, help address concerns, counter misinformation, and build trust while preserving relationships that may encourage future vaccination decisions.