Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Fibrinolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Por: Rosenfield, Kenneth [Autor]Colaborador(es): Klok, Frederikus A | Piazza, Gregory | Sharp, Andrew S.P | Ní Áinle, Fionnuala | Jaff, Michael R | Barco, StefanoTipo de material: TextoTextoIdioma: Inglés Descripción: páginas: 1979-1990Tema(s): ANTICOAGULACIÓN | TROMBOEMBOLISMO | CARDIOLOGÍA | NEUMOLOGÍA | CUIDADOS INTENSIVOS GENERAL | RADIOLOGÍA GENERAL En: The New England Journal of MedicineResumen: Background: Whether anticoagulation alone is an adequate treatment for acute, intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is uncertain. Methods: We conducted a multinational, adaptive-design trial with blinded outcome adjudication. Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (with a ratio of right ventricular end-diastolic diameter to left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of ≥1.0 and an elevated troponin level) were eligible if they had at least two indicators of cardiorespiratory distress (systolic blood pressure of ≤110 mm Hg, a heart rate of ≥100 beats per minute, or a respiratory rate of >20 breaths per minute). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis with alteplase plus anticoagulation (the intervention group) or anticoagulation alone (the control group) according to prespecified treatment protocols. The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary embolism–related death, cardiorespiratory decompensation or collapse, or symptomatic recurrence of pulmonary embolism within 7 days. Results: The intention-to-treat population comprised 544 patients: 273 in the intervention group and 271 in the control group. The mean (±SD) age was 58.2±13.5 years, and 42.6% of the patients were women. A primary-outcome event occurred in 11 patients (4.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 7.1) in the intervention group and 28 (10.3%; 95% CI, 7.2 to 14.5) in the control group (relative risk, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.77; P=0.005). The effect was driven primarily by a lower risk of cardiorespiratory decompensation or collapse in the intervention group. Major bleeding occurred within 7 days after randomization in 11 patients (4.1%) in the intervention group and 6 (2.2%) in the control group (P=0.32); major bleeding occurred within 30 days in 11 patients (4.1%) and 8 patients (3.0%), respectively (P=0.64). No substantial between-group differences in the incidence of other serious adverse events were observed up to 30 days after randomization; no intracranial hemorrhage occurred. Conclusions: In patients with acute, intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis plus anticoagulation led to a lower risk of the composite of pulmonary embolism–related death, cardiopulmonary decompensation or collapse, or symptomatic recurrence of pulmonary embolism within 7 days than anticoagulation alone.
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Tipo de ítem Ubicación actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Títulos de Revistas Títulos de Revistas Biblioteca Central ESSALUD
Colección General NEJM (Navegar estantería) Vol.394, No.20 (2026) Disponible NEJM013

Background: Whether anticoagulation alone is an adequate treatment for acute, intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is uncertain. Methods: We conducted a multinational, adaptive-design trial with blinded outcome adjudication. Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (with a ratio of right ventricular end-diastolic diameter to left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of ≥1.0 and an elevated troponin level) were eligible if they had at least two indicators of cardiorespiratory distress (systolic blood pressure of ≤110 mm Hg, a heart rate of ≥100 beats per minute, or a respiratory rate of >20 breaths per minute). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis with alteplase plus anticoagulation (the intervention group) or anticoagulation alone (the control group) according to prespecified treatment protocols. The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary embolism–related death, cardiorespiratory decompensation or collapse, or symptomatic recurrence of pulmonary embolism within 7 days. Results: The intention-to-treat population comprised 544 patients: 273 in the intervention group and 271 in the control group. The mean (±SD) age was 58.2±13.5 years, and 42.6% of the patients were women. A primary-outcome event occurred in 11 patients (4.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 7.1) in the intervention group and 28 (10.3%; 95% CI, 7.2 to 14.5) in the control group (relative risk, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.77; P=0.005). The effect was driven primarily by a lower risk of cardiorespiratory decompensation or collapse in the intervention group. Major bleeding occurred within 7 days after randomization in 11 patients (4.1%) in the intervention group and 6 (2.2%) in the control group (P=0.32); major bleeding occurred within 30 days in 11 patients (4.1%) and 8 patients (3.0%), respectively (P=0.64). No substantial between-group differences in the incidence of other serious adverse events were observed up to 30 days after randomization; no intracranial hemorrhage occurred. Conclusions: In patients with acute, intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis plus anticoagulation led to a lower risk of the composite of pulmonary embolism–related death, cardiopulmonary decompensation or collapse, or symptomatic recurrence of pulmonary embolism within 7 days than anticoagulation alone.