03491nam a2200337   4500001000800000005001700008007000300025008004100028040000800069041000800077100002700085245008700112300002500199520248700224650004202711650002402753650001802777650001602795650003202811700002002843700001802863700002202881700001902903700002302922700002302945700001902968700002402987700001803011700002103029773010303050ESSALUD20260902144423.0ta      t        pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d  aBMG  aeng  aShitara, Kohei eAutor  aZanidatamab with and without Tislelizumab in HER2-Positive Gastroesophageal Cancer  apáginas: 2002-2014  aBackground: Zanidatamab, a dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–targeted bispecific antibody, plus chemotherapy both with and without tislelizumab (anti–programmed death 1), showed encouraging efficacy and safety as first-line therapy in phase 2 studies involving patients with HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods: In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated, centrally confirmed HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to receive zanidatamab and tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, zanidatamab plus chemotherapy, or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. The two primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: At a median follow-up of 25.9 months, progression-free survival was longer with zanidatamab–tislelizumab–chemotherapy (median among 302 patients, 12.4 months) and zanidatamab–chemotherapy (median among 304 patients, 12.4 months) than with trastuzumab–chemotherapy (median among 308 patients, 8.1 months) (hazard ratio for progression or death with zanidatamab–tislelizumab–chemotherapy, 0.63 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.51 to 0.78]; hazard ratio with zanidatamab–chemotherapy, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.81]; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Overall survival was longer with zanidatamab–tislelizumab–chemotherapy than with trastuzumab–chemotherapy (median, 26.4 vs. 19.2 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.90; P=0.004). At this interim analysis, overall survival did not differ significantly between zanidatamab–chemotherapy (median, 24.4 months) and trastuzumab–chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.01; P=0.06). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 83.3% with zanidatamab–tislelizumab–chemotherapy, 73.8% with zanidatamab–chemotherapy, and 74.5% with trastuzumab–chemotherapy; diarrhea was the most common such event, in 24.8%, 20.0%, and 12.9% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Zanidatamab plus chemotherapy, both with and without tislelizumab, led to longer progression-free survival than trastuzumab plus chemotherapy among patients with HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. At this interim analysis, overall survival was longer with zanidatamab–tislelizumab–chemotherapy than with trastuzumab–chemotherapy; further analyses are planned to assess zanidatamab–chemotherapy. Diarrhea was a common adverse event.  aCÁNCER DEL TRACTO GASTROINTESTINAL   aGASTROENTEROLOGÍA  aHEMATOLOGÍA  aONCOLOGÍA  aTRATAMIENTOS EN ONCOLOGÍA  aElimova, Elena   aLiu, Tianshu   aTabernero, Josep   aLee, Keun-Wook  aSchenker, Michael   aTebbutt, Niall C.   aAjani, Jaffer   aSalimin, Norhidayu   aKu, Geoffrey   aKim, Jong Gwang 0 022717dMassachusetts NEJM GroupoNEJM013tThe New England Journal of Medicine wESSALUDx0028-4793