<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03287nam a2200325   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">ESSALUD</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260817162604.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">      t        pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BMG</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mina, Roberto </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Autor</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53814</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Talquetamab&#x2013;daratumumab in relapsed or refractory myeloma</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p&#xE1;ginas: 671-683</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Background: Talquetamab, a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D and CD3, has led to durable responses in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in phase 1&#x2013;2 trials, with a limited effect on normal B cells. Methods: In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had previously received at least one line of therapy to receive talquetamab plus daratumumab and pomalidomide (Tal-DP), talquetamab plus daratumumab (Tal-D), or daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent review committee. Key secondary end points were overall response, complete response or better (complete or stringent complete response), measurable residual disease&#x2013;negative complete response, and overall survival. Results: A total of 287, 287, and 290 patients were assigned to the Tal-DP, Tal-D, and DPd groups, respectively. At the interim analysis (median follow-up, 24.6 months), progression-free survival was significantly longer with Tal-DP and Tal-D than with DPd (24-month estimate, 81.3% and 77.6% vs. 51.2%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, Tal-DP vs. DPd, 0.28 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.20 to 0.40], and Tal-D vs. DPd, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.46]; P&lt;0.001 for both comparisons). The overall response was higher with Tal-DP and Tal-D than with DPd (88.2% and 88.5% vs. 77.6%), as was complete response or better (71.1% and 69.0% vs. 34.5%) and measurable residual disease&#x2013;negative complete response (52.3% and 46.3% vs. 15.9%) (P&lt;0.001 for all comparisons). Overall survival at 24 months was 89.2% with Tal-DP, 87.9% with Tal-D, and 79.1% with DPd (hazard ratio for death, Tal-DP vs. DPd, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.73], and Tal-D vs. DPd, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.78]). Serious adverse events occurred in 63.0%, 52.6%, and 53.7% of the patients in the Tal-DP, Tal-D, and DPd groups, respectively; fatal adverse events occurred in 1.8%, 4.0%, and 4.6%. Conclusions: Among patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had previously received at least one line of therapy, both Tal-DP and Tal-D led to significantly longer progression-free survival than DPd. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LEUCEMIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">33873</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LINFOMA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">39360</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CUIDADOS INTENSIVOS GENERAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54115</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TRATAMIENTOS EN ONCOLOG&#xCD;A</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53734</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Beksac, Meral </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54122</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rodr&#xED;guez-Otero, Paula </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54123</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chen,Wenming </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53818</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mateos, Mar&#xED;a-Victoria </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54124</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Li, Jian  </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54125</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Moreau, Philippe  </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54126</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cohen, Yael C. </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54127</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Min, Chang-Ki </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">54128</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">22717</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22647</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Massachusetts NEJM Group</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">NEJM010</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">The New England Journal of Medicine </subfield>
    <subfield code="w">ESSALUD</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0028-4793</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULOS</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">SQB</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">22827</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">22827</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
