02905nam a2200265   4500001000800000007000300008008004100011040000800052041000800060100012400068245007100192300002300263520196800286650002502254650002502279650002702304650003002331650003602361650001702397650002402414650004302438773011002481942003102591999001702622ESSALUDta      t        pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d  aBMG  aeng  aThe LOGICAL Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials GroupeAutor954074  aConservative oxygen for unresponsive patients after cardiac arrest  apáginas: 571-581  aBackground: In patients who are unresponsive after resuscitation from cardiac arrest, limiting oxygen exposure to that necessary to achieve acceptable oxygenation may increase the likelihood of survival with a favorable functional outcome. Methods: We randomly assigned unresponsive adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac arrest to conservative or liberal oxygen therapy. In the two groups, the default lower limit of arterial oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) was 90%. In the conservative-oxygen group, the alarm for the upper limit of the Spo2 was set at 95%, and the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) was decreased to 0.21 provided that the Spo2 was above the lower limit. In the liberal-oxygen group, there were no measures limiting the upper Spo2, but the minimum Fio2 permitted during mechanical ventilation was 0.3. The primary outcome was survival with a favorable functional outcome at 180 days, assessed with the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E). Levels on the GOS-E range from 1 (death) to 8 (“upper good recovery”). We defined survival with a favorable functional outcome as a GOS-E level of 5 (“lower moderate disability”) or higher. Results: A total of 1840 patients were recruited from 53 ICUs in Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland, with 882 assigned to conservative oxygen therapy and 958 assigned to liberal oxygen therapy. A favorable functional outcome at 180 days was observed for 313 of 819 patients (38.2%) in the conservative-oxygen group and 353 of 890 patients (39.7%) in the liberal-oxygen group (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.09; P=0.65). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Among unresponsive adults undergoing mechanical ventilation in the ICU after a cardiac arrest, the percentage who survived with a favorable functional outcome was not higher with conservative oxygen therapy than with liberal oxygen therapy.  aCARDIOLOGÍA911301  aPARO CARDIACO911402  aMUERTE CEREBRAL954075  aCUIDADOS INTENSIVOS95208  aVENTILACIÓN MECÁNICA937360  aNEUROLOGÍA  aNEUMOLOGÍA925628  aMEDICINA CLÍNICA HOSPITALARIA9537540 022717922644dMassachusetts NEJM GroupoNEJM009tThe New England Journal of Medicine wESSALUDx0028-4793  cARTICULOSe2026-08-17zSQB  c22820d22820