<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02984nam a2200265   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">ESSALUD</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">      t        pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BMG</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">spa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Touzeau, Cyrille</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Autor</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53813</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Teclistamab in multiple myeloma with one to three previous lines of therapy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p&#xE1;ginas: 440-453</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Background: The efficacy of teclistamab, a bispecific antibody targeting B-cell maturation antigen and CD3, as early-line monotherapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is unclear.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had previously received one, two, or three lines of therapy, including an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and lenalidomide, to receive teclistamab or the investigator&#x2019;s choice of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) or carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd). Antimicrobial prophylaxis and immune globulin replacement were recommended. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent review committee.
Results: A total of 296 patients were assigned to teclistamab and 297 to PVd or Kd. At the interim analysis (median follow-up, 17.3 months), teclistamab significantly improved progression-free survival as compared with PVd or Kd (estimated 18-month progression-free survival, 69.8% vs. 26.9%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.38; P&lt;0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher with teclistamab than with PVd or Kd (65.9% vs. 16.8%, P&lt;0.001). Overall survival was improved with teclistamab as compared with PVd or Kd (estimated 18-month overall survival, 79.2% vs. 68.6%; hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.83; P=0.002). Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 84.9% of teclistamab recipients and in 76.3% of PVd or Kd recipients, with grade 5 adverse events in 6.5% and 3.5%, respectively. Cytokine release syndrome, mostly of grade 1 or 2, occurred in 66.0% of teclistamab recipients, and immune effector cell&#x2013;associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 4.1%. Grade 3 or 4 infection occurred in 41.6% of teclistamab recipients and in 29.0% of PVd or Kd recipients. Conclusions: Among patients with multiple myeloma and one to three previous lines of therapy, teclistamab significantly improved progression-free and overall survival as compared with PVd or Kd. Infections of grade 3 or 4 were common. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TRATAMIENTOS EN ONCOLOG&#xCD;A</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53734</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LEUCEMIA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">33873</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LINFOMA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">39360</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mina, Roberto </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53814</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Quach, Hang  </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53815</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hungria, Vania </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53816</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bhutani, Divaya  </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53817</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chen, Wenming </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53818</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">22717</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22638</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Massachusetts NEJM Group</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">NEJM005</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">The New England Journal of Medicine </subfield>
    <subfield code="w">ESSALUD</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0028-4793</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULOS</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">2026-07-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">SQB</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">22751</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">22751</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
