<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03552nam a2200277   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">ESSALUD</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">      t        pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BMG</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Galsky, Matthew D.</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Autor</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53782</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in cisplatin-eligible bladder cancer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p&#xE1;ginas: 338-348</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Background: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is a standard therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant (perioperative) enfortumab vedotin&#x2013;pembrolizumab as compared with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in persons with this cancer are unclear. 
Methods: We conducted a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial involving adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph-node dissection (cystectomy). Participants were assigned to receive neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin&#x2013;pembrolizumab (4 cycles; enfortumab vedotin [1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight on days 1 and 8] and pembrolizumab [200 mg on day 1] every 3 weeks), cystectomy, and 5 cycles of enfortumab vedotin and 13 cycles of pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy or to receive neoadjuvant cisplatin&#x2013;gemcitabine (4 cycles; cisplatin [70 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 1] plus gemcitabine [1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8] every 3 weeks) and cystectomy. The primary end point was event-free survival; key secondary end points were overall survival and pathological complete response. Safety was assessed. Results: A total of 405 participants were assigned to receive enfortumab vedotin&#x2013;pembrolizumab and 403 to receive cisplatin&#x2013;gemcitabine. The median time from randomization to the data-cutoff date was 33.6 months (range, 22.5 to 53.6). A total of 86.7% of the participants in the enfortumab vedotin&#x2013;pembrolizumab group and 89.6% of those in the cisplatin&#x2013;gemcitabine group underwent cystectomy. At 2 years, estimated event-free survival was 79.4% with enfortumab vedotin&#x2013;pembrolizumab and 66.2% with cisplatin&#x2013;gemcitabine (hazard ratio for an event or death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.70; P&lt;0.001); estimated overall survival was 86.9% and 81.3%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; two-sided P=0.006). A pathological complete response occurred in 55.8% and 32.5% of the participants (P&lt;0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause was 75.7% with enfortumab vedotin&#x2013;pembrolizumab and 67.2% with cisplatin&#x2013;gemcitabine. Conclusions: Among participants with muscle-invasive bladder cancer eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, perioperative enfortumab vedotin&#x2013;pembrolizumab led to significantly better event-free and overall survival outcomes and a significantly higher incidence of pathological complete response than neoadjuvant cisplatin&#x2013;gemcitabine, but with more adverse events of grade 3 or higher.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ENFERMEDADES DE LA PR&#xD3;STATA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53783</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UROLOG&#xCD;A</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">6502</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TRATAMIENTO EN ONCOLOG&#xCD;A</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53713</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CANCER GENITOURINARIO</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53654</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Valderrama, Bego&#xF1;a P.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53784</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Maruzzo, Marco </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53785</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Font, Albert </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53786</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ciuleanu, Tudor </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53787</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chatzkel, Jonathan </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53788</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">22717</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22637</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Massachusetts NEJM Group</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">NEJM004</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">The New England Journal of Medicine </subfield>
    <subfield code="w">ESSALUD</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0028-4793</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULOS</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">2026-07-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">SQB</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">22745</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">22745</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
