<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02549nam a2200277   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">ESSALUD</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260701101443.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">      t        pe ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BMG</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">spa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mejorada Chauca, Mart&#xED;n </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Autor</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">47592</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Modificaciones en la recuperaci&#xF3;n de bienes del Estado &#xBF;Acierto o retroceso?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="246" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Amendments to the recovery of State-owned property. Progress or regression?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p&#xE1;ginas 9-11</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">En una reciente sentencia de amparo del Tribunal Constitucional (Expediente N&#xB0; 161-2022-PA/TC), se ha interpretado la Ley N&#xB0; 30230 para establecer que no se puede aplicar la facultad del Estado de recuperar sus bienes si existe duplicidad de partidas, por lo que previamente se debe resolver en juicio qui&#xE9;n tiene el derecho. El autor considera que esta es una sentencia equivocada, que condena al Estado a litigar por varios a&#xF1;os antes de acceder a sus bienes, postergando el inter&#xE9;s p&#xFA;blico frente a ciertos intereses particulares. Igualmente, afirma que, lamentablemente, dicha situaci&#xF3;n ha quedado convalidada por el Decreto Legislativo N&#xBA; 1726, del 11 febrero de 2026, norma que ha eliminado toda ventaja que ten&#xED;a el Estado contra "ocupantes ilegales".</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In a recent constitutional re lief judgment (Amparo proceedings, Case No. 161 -2022-PA/TC), the Constitutional Court interpreted Law No. 30230 to establish that the State's authority to recover its property cannot be exercised in cases involving overlapping title deeds. Consequently, the rightful ownership must be adjudicated in court prior to recovery. The author contends that this is an erroneous ruling that condemns the State ta years of litigation before regaining access to its assets, thereby subordinating the public interest to certain private interests. Furthermore, the author asserts that this situation has been unfortunately validated by Legislative Decree No. 1726, issued on February 11, 2026-a regulation that has eliminated the legal advantages the State previously held against "illegal occupants"
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BIENES DEL ESTADO</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OCUPANTES ILEGALES </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DESALOJO EXTRAJUDICIAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53021</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">STATE-AWNED PROPERTY </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53028</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ILEGAL OCCUPANTS </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53029</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">EXTRAJUDICIAL EVICTION</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">53030</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">22573</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22621</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Lima Grupo Praxis Formaci&#xF3;n Profesional, 2026-</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">PRA002</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Praxis Civil &amp; Procesal Civil</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">ESSALUD</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">3119-7671</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ARTICULOS</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">2026-07-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">sqb</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">22590</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">22590</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
