A Eulogy for Structural Competence?
Por: Greene, Jeremy A [Autor]
Colaborador(es): Glenn, Jason E | Niehuus, Rachel M | Jones, David STipo de material: 
TextoIdioma: Inglés Descripción: páginas: 1974-1976Tema(s): PRÁCTICA MÉDICA | MEDICINA CLÍNICA GENERAL | ÉTICA MÉDICA | POLÍTICA SANITARIA | CALIDAD DE LA ATENCIÓN
En: The New England Journal of MedicineResumen: Structural competence died a quiet death in March 2026, when the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) ruled that medical schools in the United States no longer need to teach either structural competence or health equity to receive accreditation. Journal readers may be forgiven for knowing more about the latter than the former. The teaching of health equity in medical schools had already been targeted by “antiwoke” activists, whereas structural competence, a wonkier term, had not previously elicited backlash. But it played a crucial role in legitimating the inclusion of social sciences and upstream interventions in medical education.
| Tipo de ítem | Ubicación actual | Colección | Signatura | Info Vol | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Títulos de Revistas
|
Biblioteca Central ESSALUD | Colección General | NEJM (Navegar estantería) | Vol.394, No.20 (2026) | Disponible | NEJM013 |
Structural competence died a quiet death in March 2026, when the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) ruled that medical schools in the United States no longer need to teach either structural competence or health equity to receive accreditation. Journal readers may be forgiven for knowing more about the latter than the former. The teaching of health equity in medical schools had already been targeted by “antiwoke” activists, whereas structural competence, a wonkier term, had not previously elicited backlash. But it played a crucial role in legitimating the inclusion of social sciences and upstream interventions in medical education.